Throughline Connector Kit
The sanitized public kit behind Throughline: one four-method connector contract, the sync engine, sample CRM data, and tests.
Meter shows operator discovery through ongoing operations. Throughline shows the shared contract behind six integrations. CoHost shows measured AI gates before release.
I keep walking into the same two conversations. The AI side needs someone who has already owned a CRM pipeline and billing reconciliation. The operations side needs evaluated AI with a review path and an operator who can stop it.
I sit between those lanes. Ten-plus years owning the systems that move work from a new lead to a paid invoice is the base layer: most recently as Head of Technology at Real News Public Relations, sole technical owner across six SaaS platforms and eight-plus production systems since 2018. Internal tools, applied AI, eval harnesses, and human review are the newer layer on top.
I learned this work inside my father’s company, where I was the only engineer. Head of Technology describes the function: I owned the systems, incidents, releases, and handoffs myself.
The same studio also runs the live TV production automation I built: the operator stays on the live decision.
Start with the connector contract behind production integrations, then inspect the delivery and human-review boundaries. The rest stays in the proof ledger.
27 public extracts on the proof ledger
The sanitized public kit behind Throughline: one four-method connector contract, the sync engine, sample CRM data, and tests.
An agent that takes an approved GitHub issue and returns a tested, reviewable pull request.
Human review as an API: agents submit work, real reviewers return a consensus verdict.
Always glad to compare notes with people building applied-AI workflows, internal tools, and the business systems they run on. If you’re hiring for that work, email me. I read everything and reply within a day.
Senior IC · Dallas–Fort Worth · remote preferred or DFW hybrid